NTr6cg4eqy

Because outsiders do not have a Beijing hukou, a real estate license only the husband's name. My husband asked for a divorce want to monopolize the room, for the prosecution, Ms. Jing to the court,hogan, asking the court to confirm their common property for housing. Yesterday, reporters learned,escarpin louboutin pas cher,http://revillusions.com/md/mdportal/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=165710, Fengtai court based on the new "judicial interpretation of the Marriage Law of Three" involved in housing should be considered personal property belonging to the husband,hogan outlet online,http://www.zzlsny.com/forum/Default.aspx?g=posts&t=274000, the judgment dismissed the claims of Ms. Jing. This is after the Supreme Court issued "on the application (People's Republic of China Marriage Law) Interpretation of Several Issues Three",Hogan outlet, the city's first-related cases.

Total housing requirements wife

Plaintiff Ms. Jing recalled that she and Mr. Lee August 16, 2006 registration of marriage, marriage parties in January 2007 mortgage to buy a set of affordable housing, the total price of 400,hogan outlet sito ufficiale,000 yuan. When buying a house, she did not Beijing accounts, her husband Lee have a Beijing hukou. As the housing involved can only be purchased by a person who has a Beijing hukou,hogan outlet online,http://bbs.cnw.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, they are in the process of registration of property rights transfer, the only mention of the name of Mr. Lee,mulberry outlet 2014, Ms. Jing's name failed to mention.

Ms. Jing said that when she and Lee co-payment to buy a house down payment,louboutin pas cher homme, joint loans, and later, the two co-income families to repay the loan principal and interest so far. Today, Lee proposed a variety of reasons, and she wanted a divorce,http://www.hyphoto.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=241630, and real estate license in the department refused her name, has exclusive listing meaning. In order to protect their own interests, she requested the court to confirm their common property involved in housing.

Husband said the parents financed housing

The defendant does not agree with Ms. Li Jing statement. Lee said that the first payment is involved in housing funded by their parents, the house registered in his own name, is his personal gift, he never filed for divorce several times. Lee believes that, under the new "three judicial interpretation of the Marriage Law" the relevant provisions, involving housing should be recognized as a spouse's personal property, he asked Ms. Jing dismissed the appeal.

To prove his argument, Mr. Lee invited his mother to testify. As a witness, Mr. Li's mother said her son Lee volunteered to buy a house,hogan, she and her husband, together with his son and daughter to see the room, she gave her son a total of more than 170,http://www.sxufe.cc/home.php?mod=space&uid=71545,000 yuan for the purchase. Ms. Li Jing mother does not recognize the witness statement, she said that marriage is also financed the purchase of their parents,http://bbs.56913.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=7213&extra=, there are a couple of common purchase money deposit.

■ court

All personal property owned by husband

Fengtai court held that housing is involved, Ms. Jing and Li during the marital relationship continues to buy, but buyers down payment paid by the Department of Lee's mother, Lee property rights registered in the name of explaining the new marriage law in accordance with the provisions of the three judicial,http://bbs.cnw.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, married parents financed by a party for the children to buy real estate, property rights registered in the name of the investor children, can be seen as only one of their children the gift of the estate should be recognized as a spouse's personal property. Housing should be involved in Lee's personal property belonging to the plaintiff, Ms. Jing requirements recognized as jointly owned property,hogan outlet milano, the court not support it.

However,cheap mulberry outlet, the court pointed out that the taxes paid on the purchase process and after the mortgage is paid by the original defendant, the use of the common property of husband and wife, so if the original defendant appeared after a divorce case,hogan outlet,http://www.hxdatian.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, divorce, home ownership should be given to the other party compensation. Accordingly, the court dismissed the claims of Ms. Jing.

Morning News reporter Wu Xin